It is with
iron clad assurance that I can state there are one ‘collective’ group of
organisations that will not fit in to Catholic Archbishop Pell’s “It wasn’t
just the Catholic Church that hoped (an abusive priest) would amend their
conduct and give them a home somewhere else”... and that is, Three-piece
Patched Motorcycle Clubs. This I can state with absolute knowledge, that this
type of behaviour would not be tolerated by any Patch Club.
Unlike the
Catholic Church, and unfortunately the Archbishop Pell is correct as we know
the Anglican Church and the Exclusive Brethren have all conspired to cover up Paedophilia within their
Churches, and there can be no doubt that other organisations have done the same.
The open letter from Senior Detective Peter Fox to Premier Barry O’Farrell
clearly makes the allegation, “I can testify from my own experience that the
church covers up, silences victims, hinders police investigations, alerts offenders,
destroys evidence and moves priests to protect the good name of the church,” it
is similar claims against Patched Motorcycle Clubs (not Paedophilia, but
silencing witnesses, hindering police investigations, etc;) that sees
legislation brought in that has so far proven to be unconstitutional, to have them
declared Criminal Organisations. As yet there has not been a politician with
the testicular fortitude to suggest that the Catholic Church is, under the
definition of Criminal Organisation within the various acts, is in fact a
criminal organisation and should be treated the same way as Motorcycle Clubs.
The following from the QLD Criminal Organisations Act 2009
10 Court may make a declaration
(1)
The court may make a declaration that the respondent is a criminal organisation
if the court is satisfied that—
(a) the respondent is an organisation; and
(b) members of the organisation associate for
the purpose of engaging in, or conspiring
to engage in, serious criminal activity; and
(c) the organisation is an unacceptable risk to the safety, welfare
or order of the community.
(2)
In considering whether or not to make a declaration, the court must have regard
to—
(a) the following information before the court—
(i) information suggesting a link exists
between the organisation and serious criminal activity;
(ii) any
conviction for current or former members of the organisation;
(iii) information suggesting current or
former members of the organisation have been, or are, involved in serious
criminal activity, whether directly or
indirectly
and whether or not the involvement resulted in convictions;
(iv) information suggesting members of an
interstate or overseas chapter or branch of the organisation associate for the
purpose of engaging in, or
conspiring
to engage in, serious criminal activity;
“Lest we forget “
No comments:
Post a Comment